All case studies

ReconWind energy, onshore

Stopping the right turbine on the right day

An operator of a 24-turbine onshore farm schedules service by interval and crew availability, and books each stop as the stopped turbine's own lost output. This case follows ten weeks of planning maintenance, production settings and one siting question in a single model of the farm.

Organisation
An onshore farm, 24 turbines in four rows
Decision
When to stop which turbine, and whether to steer wakes
Duration
Ten weeks, then a full season
Runs in
The operator's private cloud

> The starting point

Three Calendars,One Farm

Maintenance is planned by the service team against intervals and crew rosters. Production settings belong to the control room, and the question of reblading row C sits with asset management, in a spreadsheet nobody else opens.

Each team is right on its own terms. But a stop on a windy day costs far more than the same stop in a calm, a wake steered off one turbine lands on the one behind it, and none of that is visible from a single desk.

Who
Three teams, three tools
On what
Service intervals, crew availability, nameplate output
When
Weekly, by calendar
Lost output
Booked per turbine, wakes ignored

# What could not move

What The FarmWould Not Allow

Settled in the first week, before any model was built. Each one decided part of the architecture.

% The architecture

One Model Of The Farm,Three Decisions In It

The farm is represented once. A plan is weighed against the wind it will meet, the loads it will cause and the access it needs before it reaches anyone's schedule.

  1. Read

    • Turbine records and SCADA history
    • The wind forecast, re-read daily
    • The maintenance backlog and crew roster
  2. Model

    • Wakes between turbines, by wind direction
    • The fatigue each setting moves downstream
    • Lost production at farm level
  3. Plan

    • Stops placed in low-wind windows
    • Jobs grouped by crew and travel
    • Siting questions raised from operating history
  4. Hand over

    • A seven-day plan, re-planned daily
    • The reasoning behind every line
    • The operator decides; the controller is untouched

Runs inThe operator's private cloud, single-tenant.

= Ten weeks

From A BacklogTo A Daily Plan

The plan goes live only after it has been tested against seasons the farm has already lived through.

  1. ScopingWeek 0You leave with: Scope and success criteria
    The operator
    The backlog, crew rosters, open questions
    Ecarus
    Which decisions the model weighs first
  2. One model of the farmWeeks 1–3You leave with: A model that reproduces the past
    The operator
    SCADA history, layout, work orders
    Ecarus
    Wake and load model, checked against history
  3. ReplayWeeks 4–5You leave with: A comparison on the farm's own record
    The operator
    Review of past seasons' decisions
    Ecarus
    Plans replayed against what actually happened
  4. Live plansWeeks 6–9You leave with: Plans in use, decisions logged
    The operator
    Daily review, decisions taken by the operator
    Ecarus
    Daily re-planning, reasoning on every line
  5. ReviewWeek 10You leave with: A decision on the full season
    The operator
    Internal review
    Ecarus
    Results so far, a measurement plan for the season

Success criteria, agreed in week 0

= The decision, as delivered

The Plan The ControlRoom Reads Each Morning

A week of the live phase: one stop moved to a calm day, one wake setting held to protect the turbine behind it.

Operating plan, next 7 days

Week 7
Farm
Onshore, 24 turbines
Horizon
Seven days, re-planned daily
Inputs
Turbine records, wind forecast, maintenance backlog
Planned actions, by turbine
Wind forecast
  1. 1: Moderate
  2. 2: Strong
  3. 3: Calm
  4. 4: Light
  5. 5: Moderate
  6. 6: Light
  7. 7: Moderate
  1. T-07Main-bearing inspectionLowest lost production this week; crew already on site for T-09
  2. T-03No wake-steering offset in the west sectorDownstream T-04 is close to its fatigue allowance
  3. T-11Leading-edge repair moved to the next access windowDay 2 access is marginal; erosion loss at current wind is small
  4. Row CReblading versus repowering, to evaluateHighest wake exposure and fatigue history in the farm
  • Stop for maintenance
  • Production setting
  • Siting review
Why T-07 on day 3
The forecast drops below cut-in speed for most of day 3. Stopping T-07 then costs a fraction of any other day, and the crew travelling for T-09 can take both jobs on one visit.

In the product, every line opens onto the forecast, records and load estimates it rests on. The plan is a recommendation; the operator decides.

~ What gets measured

Measured OverA Full Season

Wind does not repeat week to week, so the outcome is measured over a full seasonal cycle. Results are published with the operator's approval.

MeasureBaselineHow it is measuredResult
Production lost to planned stopsThe same season last year, at farm levelWakes included, normalised for the wind actually seenPublished on approval
AvailabilityThe previous seasonal cycleTime-based, per turbine and for the farmPublished on approval
Crew visits per jobLast season's work ordersVisits and travel per completed jobPublished on approval
Fatigue on protected turbinesLoad estimates before the engagementDamage-equivalent load estimates on the turbines a setting protectsPublished on approval

What stays with the operator

  • The farm model, documented, in the operator's own cloud
  • Every plan with its reasoning, and every decision taken on it
  • One record of wakes and loads the three teams now share

Close to yours if

  • Maintenance, production and siting sit with different teams
  • Stops are scheduled by calendar and crew availability
  • Lost production is booked per turbine
  • You are weighing reblading or repowering

Your operation, in the same format

The technical briefing is where your specific constraints get discussed, including which of these four your operation resembles. Results are published with each customer's approval, never before.